November 2017

October 2017

Dishonour of Cheque—Offence by Company—If drawer of cheque (company) is not party, complaint qua accused is not maintainable merely because he was signatory of cheque. Dishonour of Cheque—Offence by Company—Complaint against director but company was not impleaded—Company cannot be allowed to be impleaded u/s 319 Cr.P. C—Complaint quashed.

By | October 26th, 2017|Cheque Bounce|

Comments Off on Dishonour of Cheque—Offence by Company—If drawer of cheque (company) is not party, complaint qua accused is not maintainable merely because he was signatory of cheque. Dishonour of Cheque—Offence by Company—Complaint against director but company was not impleaded—Company cannot be allowed to be impleaded u/s 319 Cr.P. C—Complaint quashed.

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.142-A(3)-Dishonour of Cheque-Jurisdiction of Court—(as amended w.e.f. 15.6.2015) Large number of cheques issued by accused- – Cheques dishonoured when presented to Ludhiana Branch of Bank-Courts at Ludhiana shall have the jurisdiction to entertain and try all these complaints as per law

By | June 19th, 2017|Cheque Bounce|

Comments Off on Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.142-A(3)-Dishonour of Cheque-Jurisdiction of Court—(as amended w.e.f. 15.6.2015) Large number of cheques issued by accused- – Cheques dishonoured when presented to Ludhiana Branch of Bank-Courts at Ludhiana shall have the jurisdiction to entertain and try all these complaints as per law

Dishonour of Cheque–Compromise- Conviction of accused u/s 138 of N.I. Act-Parties entered into compromise during revision-Entire cheque amount paid-Conviction and Sentence, set aside

By | June 17th, 2017|Cheque Bounce|

Comments Off on Dishonour of Cheque–Compromise- Conviction of accused u/s 138 of N.I. Act-Parties entered into compromise during revision-Entire cheque amount paid-Conviction and Sentence, set aside

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 & S.141–Dishonour of Cheque-Offence by Company-In the present case, as the cheque in question was issued by the firm of which the petitioner was a Managing Director, the petitioner could not be tried in his personal capacity unless and until the firm also stood arraigned as an accused

By | June 13th, 2017|Cheque Bounce|

Comments Off on Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 & S.141–Dishonour of Cheque-Offence by Company-In the present case, as the cheque in question was issued by the firm of which the petitioner was a Managing Director, the petitioner could not be tried in his personal capacity unless and until the firm also stood arraigned as an accused

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.427–Concurrent running of sentences-­ Dishonour of Cheque—The settled legal position favours the exercise of the discretion to the benefit of the prisoners in cases where the prosecution is based on a single transaction, no matter even if different complaints in relation thereto might have been filed

By | June 12th, 2017|Cheque Bounce|

Comments Off on Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.427–Concurrent running of sentences-­ Dishonour of Cheque—The settled legal position favours the exercise of the discretion to the benefit of the prisoners in cases where the prosecution is based on a single transaction, no matter even if different complaints in relation thereto might have been filed

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ,S.138–Dishonour of Cheque- Loan Transactions- -No document on record to show any loan transaction between the complainant and the accused-Complainant has not proved his capacity to give such a loan

By | June 11th, 2017|Cheque Bounce|

Comments Off on Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ,S.138–Dishonour of Cheque- Loan Transactions- -No document on record to show any loan transaction between the complainant and the accused-Complainant has not proved his capacity to give such a loan

February 2017

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016