August 2018

Transfer of Property Act, 1881, S.106–Eviction–Court Fee-Shop is located where the rent law is not applicable—Therefore the plaintiffs are supposed to value their suit according to the amount of rent of the immovable property which is a shop payable for the year next before the date of presenting the plaint as per provisions of S.7(xi)(cc) of Court Fees Act-Court Fees Act, 1870, S.7.    

By | August 15th, 2018|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Transfer of Property Act, 1881, S.106–Eviction–Court Fee-Shop is located where the rent law is not applicable—Therefore the plaintiffs are supposed to value their suit according to the amount of rent of the immovable property which is a shop payable for the year next before the date of presenting the plaint as per provisions of S.7(xi)(cc) of Court Fees Act-Court Fees Act, 1870, S.7.    

February 2018

Court Fee—Challenge to gift deed in which value of property is mentioned and that cannot be taken as consideration amount—Ad valorem court fee not payable.

By | February 15th, 2018|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Court Fee—Challenge to gift deed in which value of property is mentioned and that cannot be taken as consideration amount—Ad valorem court fee not payable.

December 2017

Court Fee—Plaintiffs have sought relief of declaration as well as consequential relief of permanent injunction but have not claimed possession—Ad valorem court fee not payable. Rejection of Plaint—Issue of limitation being a mixed question of fact and law and the plaint cannot be rejected at the initial stage without leading any evidence.

By | December 15th, 2017|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Court Fee—Plaintiffs have sought relief of declaration as well as consequential relief of permanent injunction but have not claimed possession—Ad valorem court fee not payable. Rejection of Plaint—Issue of limitation being a mixed question of fact and law and the plaint cannot be rejected at the initial stage without leading any evidence.

Suit for Joint Possession-Plaintiff claiming herself to be in possession of the suit property and has not sought any consequential relief of possession-There can be no question of affixing the court fees for the relief of possession which is not sought

By | December 5th, 2017|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Suit for Joint Possession-Plaintiff claiming herself to be in possession of the suit property and has not sought any consequential relief of possession-There can be no question of affixing the court fees for the relief of possession which is not sought

November 2017

Court Fee—Plaintiffs want annulment of agreement to sell—Plaintiff liable to pay ad valorem court fee on consideration received by them.

By | November 18th, 2017|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Court Fee—Plaintiffs want annulment of agreement to sell—Plaintiff liable to pay ad valorem court fee on consideration received by them.

Since plaintiffs were claiming themselves to be owners in possession of joint property, they were not seeking any consequential relief of possession therefore ad valorem court fee was not payable

By | November 12th, 2017|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Since plaintiffs were claiming themselves to be owners in possession of joint property, they were not seeking any consequential relief of possession therefore ad valorem court fee was not payable

Court Fee—When main relief sought in the suit is cancellation of deed and any other relief if is inconsequential then advalorem court fee would not be payable.

By | November 6th, 2017|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Court Fee—When main relief sought in the suit is cancellation of deed and any other relief if is inconsequential then advalorem court fee would not be payable.

Court Fee—Agreement to Sell—Court Fee had to be affixed on total consideration as set in agreement and not on amount given.

By | November 4th, 2017|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Court Fee—Agreement to Sell—Court Fee had to be affixed on total consideration as set in agreement and not on amount given.

July 2017

April 2017

Rejection of Plaint—Inadequate Court Fee—No revision petition before High Court would be maintainable at the hands of the defendants, unless the question of court fee involves the jurisdiction of Court.

By | April 20th, 2017|Court Fees|

Read More
Comments Off on Rejection of Plaint—Inadequate Court Fee—No revision petition before High Court would be maintainable at the hands of the defendants, unless the question of court fee involves the jurisdiction of Court.

January 2017

December 2016

November 2016