Comments Off on Hindu Succession Act, 1956, S.6–Coparcenary property-Married daughter does not have right by birth in the coparcenary property and that right has only arisen after amendment i.e. w.e.f. 09.09.2005.
Comments Off on The plaintiff had earlier filed a suit claiming his right under the Hindu Succession Act and he could have taken the plea of promogeniture only in the first suit and the second suit could not have been filed-Therefore, the suit was also barred under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC.
Comments Off on Alienation of ancestral property-The suit land was ancestral property in the hands of land owner who had no male issue-He was the last coparcener, as such, was competent to alienate the -same