February 2019

December 2018

November 2018

October 2018

Public Premises—Department, who is not the owner, could not have initiated the eviction proceedings. Public Premises—in absence of violation of terms and conditions of allotment, there was no occasion for the department to cancel the allotment.

By | October 22nd, 2018|Jurisdiction - Civil Court|

Comments Off on Public Premises—Department, who is not the owner, could not have initiated the eviction proceedings. Public Premises—in absence of violation of terms and conditions of allotment, there was no occasion for the department to cancel the allotment.

Punjab Village Common Land (Regulations) Act, 1961, S.13-Jurisdiction of Civil Court—Vesting of land—Claim of Possession—Suit instituted whether the land could vest in Gram Panchayat or not prior to the enactment of the Act would be decided by Civil Court

By | October 15th, 2018|Jurisdiction - Civil Court|

Comments Off on Punjab Village Common Land (Regulations) Act, 1961, S.13-Jurisdiction of Civil Court—Vesting of land—Claim of Possession—Suit instituted whether the land could vest in Gram Panchayat or not prior to the enactment of the Act would be decided by Civil Court

Land Revenue—Sanction of Mutation—Merely because the mutation of the sale-deed of agricultural land was not sanctioned in the revenue record, the rights of a vendee in the sale-deed and his successor would not evaporate.

By | October 15th, 2018|Jurisdiction - Civil Court|

Comments Off on Land Revenue—Sanction of Mutation—Merely because the mutation of the sale-deed of agricultural land was not sanctioned in the revenue record, the rights of a vendee in the sale-deed and his successor would not evaporate.

July 2018

June 2018

April 2018

March 2018

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S.34–Interest–Suit for recovery decreed @ 12% future interest-Held; the debt cannot be taken as arising out of an ‘agricultural purpose’-Order upheld

By | March 27th, 2018|Jurisdiction - Civil Court|

Comments Off on Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S.34–Interest–Suit for recovery decreed @ 12% future interest-Held; the debt cannot be taken as arising out of an ‘agricultural purpose’-Order upheld

Jurisdiction of Tribunal-The main question involved in the suit was whether the suit land is a Wakf property or not- Plaintiff says that it is a Wakf property whereas the defendants say that it is not the Wakf property but it is their self- property–This question, can be decided only by the Tribunal and not by the Civil Court

By | March 2nd, 2018|Jurisdiction - Civil Court|

Comments Off on Jurisdiction of Tribunal-The main question involved in the suit was whether the suit land is a Wakf property or not- Plaintiff says that it is a Wakf property whereas the defendants say that it is not the Wakf property but it is their self- property–This question, can be decided only by the Tribunal and not by the Civil Court

November 2017

October 2017

August 2017

July 2017

Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, S.7-A–Jurisdiction of Civil Court-Violation of the procedure prescribed under the Act will itself give a power to the Civil Court to examine whether the notice issued was competent or not

By | July 20th, 2017|Corporate cases, Jurisdiction - Civil Court|

Comments Off on Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, S.7-A–Jurisdiction of Civil Court-Violation of the procedure prescribed under the Act will itself give a power to the Civil Court to examine whether the notice issued was competent or not

Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, S.17 &S.50-Resumption of Plot-­Non-payment of installments in time-Order passed without giving opportunity of hearing-ln such cases, jurisdiction of Civil Courts is not barred

By | July 15th, 2017|Jurisdiction - Civil Court|

Comments Off on Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, S.17 &S.50-Resumption of Plot-­Non-payment of installments in time-Order passed without giving opportunity of hearing-ln such cases, jurisdiction of Civil Courts is not barred

June 2017