September 2017

August 2017

Surplus Land—Vesting of—Only when the possession of the land which has been declared as surplus area is taken over by the State Government, then only it shall be deemed that such surplus area has been acquired by the State Government.

By | August 28th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Surplus Land—Vesting of—Only when the possession of the land which has been declared as surplus area is taken over by the State Government, then only it shall be deemed that such surplus area has been acquired by the State Government.

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.123-Partition proceedings-Stay of–Revision– Partition proceedings before revenue authorities were stayed during pendency of civil suit for declaration of title-Civil Court dismissed the suit, appeal was f iled- Contention that appeal against order of civil court is pending and appeal is continuation of suit so partition proceedings should be kept stayed-Contention rejected

By | August 22nd, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.123-Partition proceedings-Stay of–Revision– Partition proceedings before revenue authorities were stayed during pendency of civil suit for declaration of title-Civil Court dismissed the suit, appeal was f iled- Contention that appeal against order of civil court is pending and appeal is continuation of suit so partition proceedings should be kept stayed-Contention rejected

Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972, S.18(6)–Suo motu power of financial commissioner—Allotment of original allottee was cancelled and proprietary right were given to petitioners

By | August 17th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972, S.18(6)–Suo motu power of financial commissioner—Allotment of original allottee was cancelled and proprietary right were given to petitioners

July 2017

Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887–Mutation–Court has decreed the suit granting a symbolic possession in favour of petitioners against the tenant-Mutation cannot remain in abeyance

By | July 27th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887–Mutation–Court has decreed the suit granting a symbolic possession in favour of petitioners against the tenant-Mutation cannot remain in abeyance

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.123–Partition Proceedings-‘Nakha Bey’ was set aside by financial commissioner without recording the satisfaction on record that finding given by commissioner is erroneous-

By | July 24th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.123–Partition Proceedings-‘Nakha Bey’ was set aside by financial commissioner without recording the satisfaction on record that finding given by commissioner is erroneous-

Land Revenue—Partition proceedings cannot be assailed before the civil Courts on the ground that the Revenue Officer has wrongly allotted the land between co-owners.

By | July 17th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Land Revenue—Partition proceedings cannot be assailed before the civil Courts on the ground that the Revenue Officer has wrongly allotted the land between co-owners.

Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964, R.54-C{5)–Unauthorized Excavation–Demand Notice—Setting aside of–Demand notice in Form ‘S’ has to be raised only after passing of assessment order in Form ‘O’

By | July 16th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964, R.54-C{5)–Unauthorized Excavation–Demand Notice—Setting aside of–Demand notice in Form ‘S’ has to be raised only after passing of assessment order in Form ‘O’

June 2017

Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972, S.18(2) & S.16–Revision-Suo motu power-Held; power under Section 18(6) of the 1972 Act could not have been exercised by the Financial Commissioner after such an inordinate delay of 8 years

By | June 27th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972, S.18(2) & S.16–Revision-Suo motu power-Held; power under Section 18(6) of the 1972 Act could not have been exercised by the Financial Commissioner after such an inordinate delay of 8 years

Land Revenue—Partition Proceedings—Naksha Bey which has been approved is not signed by Assistant Collector 1st Grade—It is a fatal defect.

By | June 12th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Land Revenue—Partition Proceedings—Naksha Bey which has been approved is not signed by Assistant Collector 1st Grade—It is a fatal defect.

Unauthorised Occupation—Allotment of land to persons in unauthorized occupation of Government land—Such illegalities cannot be regularized by the Government.

By | June 10th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Unauthorised Occupation—Allotment of land to persons in unauthorized occupation of Government land—Such illegalities cannot be regularized by the Government.

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.123-Partition-Three chunks have been given to all the owner but two chunks which has came to the share of petitioner are facing the main road whereas a very fraction of piece of land in the share of the respondent has fallen on the main road

By | June 2nd, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.123-Partition-Three chunks have been given to all the owner but two chunks which has came to the share of petitioner are facing the main road whereas a very fraction of piece of land in the share of the respondent has fallen on the main road

May 2017

Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900, S.4 & S.5–Felling and Cutting of trees-Blanket ban by Tribunal not justified-Projects of national importance like widening of highways not to be jeopardized

By | May 30th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900, S.4 & S.5–Felling and Cutting of trees-Blanket ban by Tribunal not justified-Projects of national importance like widening of highways not to be jeopardized

Security of Land Tenures—Non availability of landowner in village and no knowledge of his residential address are not sufficient grounds for non deposit of rent—Eviction upheld.

By | May 29th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Security of Land Tenures—Non availability of landowner in village and no knowledge of his residential address are not sufficient grounds for non deposit of rent—Eviction upheld.