April 2018

Evacuee Property—Occupant cannot claim allotment of land on the pleas that they were/are in its unauthorized occupation since the 1964 or prior thereto as original allottee failed to take possession of land allotted to them being  Displaced Person’.

By | April 19th, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Evacuee Property—Occupant cannot claim allotment of land on the pleas that they were/are in its unauthorized occupation since the 1964 or prior thereto as original allottee failed to take possession of land allotted to them being  Displaced Person’.

Punjab Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, S.7–Eviction—Non payment of rent—Extension of time—Once the statute prescribes a period for compliance of a particular act, the time cannot be extended unless there is a specific provision in the statute conferring such power on an authority.  

By | April 19th, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, S.7–Eviction—Non payment of rent—Extension of time—Once the statute prescribes a period for compliance of a particular act, the time cannot be extended unless there is a specific provision in the statute conferring such power on an authority.  

Since the Gram Panchayat has lost its title qua the subject-land in favour of respondent and those orders have attained finality, the petitioners have no locus-standi or cause of action to challenge those orders as they had merely stepped into the shoes of the Gram Panchayat. 

By | April 18th, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Since the Gram Panchayat has lost its title qua the subject-land in favour of respondent and those orders have attained finality, the petitioners have no locus-standi or cause of action to challenge those orders as they had merely stepped into the shoes of the Gram Panchayat. 

March 2018

East Punjab Utilization of Lands (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2014-Renewal of Lease-­Finding as to possession of petitioner and ownership that of HUDA confirmed-­Amendment act come into existence just two months prior to passing of order by appellant authority so might have skipped his attention

By | March 18th, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on East Punjab Utilization of Lands (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2014-Renewal of Lease-­Finding as to possession of petitioner and ownership that of HUDA confirmed-­Amendment act come into existence just two months prior to passing of order by appellant authority so might have skipped his attention

Punjab Chowkidara Rules, R. 6 & R.7 -Appointment of Village watchman-Nomination by village headman and where there was more village headman, then the opinion of the majority was to prevail

By | March 12th, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Chowkidara Rules, R. 6 & R.7 -Appointment of Village watchman-Nomination by village headman and where there was more village headman, then the opinion of the majority was to prevail

January 2018

Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, S,9«Eviction–Non-payment of rent-­ Tenant admitted default in payment of rent from Kharif 1981 to Rabi 1985-Appeal against order allowing deposit of arrears of rent

By | January 8th, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, S,9«Eviction–Non-payment of rent-­ Tenant admitted default in payment of rent from Kharif 1981 to Rabi 1985-Appeal against order allowing deposit of arrears of rent

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, S.7 & S.11-Eviction-Question of title-As per entry in Wazib-ul-Arz the land was reserved for the income of Gram Panchayat therefore, Gram Panchayat held entitle to maintain eviction suit-

By | January 7th, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, S.7 & S.11-Eviction-Question of title-As per entry in Wazib-ul-Arz the land was reserved for the income of Gram Panchayat therefore, Gram Panchayat held entitle to maintain eviction suit-

East Punjab Holdings—Order was passed without opportunity of hearing-Matter remanded to consolidation officer after 23 years of passing such an order.

By | January 7th, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on East Punjab Holdings—Order was passed without opportunity of hearing-Matter remanded to consolidation officer after 23 years of passing such an order.

Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973, S.7–Unauthorized Occupation-Except the Resolution, there is no other documentary evidence placed on record to establish that the petitioner had been a tenant and paying the rent regularly

By | January 2nd, 2018|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973, S.7–Unauthorized Occupation-Except the Resolution, there is no other documentary evidence placed on record to establish that the petitioner had been a tenant and paying the rent regularly

December 2017

November 2017

September 2017

August 2017

Surplus Land—Vesting of—Only when the possession of the land which has been declared as surplus area is taken over by the State Government, then only it shall be deemed that such surplus area has been acquired by the State Government.

By | August 28th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Surplus Land—Vesting of—Only when the possession of the land which has been declared as surplus area is taken over by the State Government, then only it shall be deemed that such surplus area has been acquired by the State Government.

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.123-Partition proceedings-Stay of–Revision– Partition proceedings before revenue authorities were stayed during pendency of civil suit for declaration of title-Civil Court dismissed the suit, appeal was f iled- Contention that appeal against order of civil court is pending and appeal is continuation of suit so partition proceedings should be kept stayed-Contention rejected

By | August 22nd, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.123-Partition proceedings-Stay of–Revision– Partition proceedings before revenue authorities were stayed during pendency of civil suit for declaration of title-Civil Court dismissed the suit, appeal was f iled- Contention that appeal against order of civil court is pending and appeal is continuation of suit so partition proceedings should be kept stayed-Contention rejected

Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972, S.18(6)–Suo motu power of financial commissioner—Allotment of original allottee was cancelled and proprietary right were given to petitioners

By | August 17th, 2017|Revenue Cases|

Comments Off on Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972, S.18(6)–Suo motu power of financial commissioner—Allotment of original allottee was cancelled and proprietary right were given to petitioners

July 2017