Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302-Murder-Abscondence-Acquittal-Mere fact that the two accused may have absconded immediately and the fact that false information may have been given about the whereabouts of the deceased are not enough to complete the chain of circumstances.

Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302–Murder–Abscondence–Acquittal-Mere fact that the two accused may have absconded immediately and the fact that false information may have been given about the whereabouts of the deceased are not enough to complete the chain of circumstances.

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.

By phlaw| August 10th, 2018|Acquittal|Comments Off

Permalink
Gallery
Narcotics—Owner of Vehicle—Owner was not in the control of the said vehicle at the time of commission of crime—Acquitted
November 30th, 2018 | Comments Off on Narcotics—Owner of Vehicle—Owner was not in the control of the said vehicle at the time of commission of crime—Acquitted
Permalink
Gallery
Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.376~Rape–Medical Evidence-Acquittal-As per evidence of doctor prosecutrix had sexual intercourse within 48 hours of her examination-Allegedly offence was committee about 43 days earlier from date of examination-Accused acquitted.
November 30th, 2018 | Comments Off on Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.376~Rape–Medical Evidence-Acquittal-As per evidence of doctor prosecutrix had sexual intercourse within 48 hours of her examination-Allegedly offence was committee about 43 days earlier from date of examination-Accused acquitted.
Permalink
Gallery
Dishonour of Cheque—Notice—Legal notice issued to the accused was neither signed by the complainant nor by his counsel, therefore, that is not a valid legal notice—Accused acquitted.
November 10th, 2018 | Comments Off on Dishonour of Cheque—Notice—Legal notice issued to the accused was neither signed by the complainant nor by his counsel, therefore, that is not a valid legal notice—Accused acquitted.
Permalink
Gallery
Kidnapping for Ransom-Murder-Acquittal-There is no material attribution to appellant (co-accused) at the time of murder or calling for ransom-Salary slip belonging to father of deceased was recovered from the house of appellant-Held; Only this circumstance is insufficient to connect appellant with the crime beyond doubt
October 8th, 2018 | Comments Off on Kidnapping for Ransom-Murder-Acquittal-There is no material attribution to appellant (co-accused) at the time of murder or calling for ransom-Salary slip belonging to father of deceased was recovered from the house of appellant-Held; Only this circumstance is insufficient to connect appellant with the crime beyond doubt
Permalink
Gallery
Murder–Gunshot Injury-Acquittal-Mere recovery of pistol and the matching of bullet cannot be enough to convict the person for offence of murder, when there is absolutely no evidence to show as to who fired the bullet from the pistol and at whom it was fired-Accused acquitted.
October 8th, 2018 | Comments Off on Murder–Gunshot Injury-Acquittal-Mere recovery of pistol and the matching of bullet cannot be enough to convict the person for offence of murder, when there is absolutely no evidence to show as to who fired the bullet from the pistol and at whom it was fired-Accused acquitted.
Permalink
Gallery
Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302~Murder–Intention to kill-Intention to cause death must not be readily inferred-Merely because accused pierced the chest of deceased with spear (ballam), it cannot be assumed that accused intended to cause death.
July 24th, 2018 | Comments Off on Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302~Murder–Intention to kill-Intention to cause death must not be readily inferred-Merely because accused pierced the chest of deceased with spear (ballam), it cannot be assumed that accused intended to cause death.
Permalink
Gallery
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.293—Expert Evidence- Admissibility of -Comparison of Signatures-Report submitted by Assistant Director (Document) could be per se admissible as the officer in the rank of Assistant Director would fall at Sr.No.E of sub-Section (4) of Section 293 CrPC—Such report not to be discarded on the ground that neither the author of the report nor any other officer, well conversant with the facts of the case who could satisfactorily depose in Court on behalf of the author of the report, has also been produced as a witness
July 16th, 2018 | Comments Off on Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.293—Expert Evidence- Admissibility of -Comparison of Signatures-Report submitted by Assistant Director (Document) could be per se admissible as the officer in the rank of Assistant Director would fall at Sr.No.E of sub-Section (4) of Section 293 CrPC—Such report not to be discarded on the ground that neither the author of the report nor any other officer, well conversant with the facts of the case who could satisfactorily depose in Court on behalf of the author of the report, has also been produced as a witness

Search Here

Recive law updates, daily – Subscribe to our LawLetter

Find us on Facebook

Supreme Court of India – Judgements

Indian IPR resources.

Membership open – Laws of India info group – LAWSINDIA.IN – Visit

Guests have searched for Punjab & Haryana law

Judgements – Topic wise

Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302–Murder–Abscondence–Acquittal-Mere fact that the two accused may have absconded immediately and the fact that false information may have been given about the whereabouts of the deceased are not enough to complete the chain of circumstances.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Related Posts

Recive law updates, daily – Subscribe to our LawLetter

Find us on Facebook

Supreme Court of India – Judgements

Indian IPR resources.

Guests have searched for Punjab & Haryana law

Judgements – Topic wise