May 2020
-
Permalink GalleryAMENDMENT – SECOND APPLICATION – There is no bar to move more than one application for amendment, if the circumstances so warrant. In the instant case, moving of second application was warranted on account of typographical correction in the judgment and decree to incorporate khasra , which was statedly left out inadvertently
-
Permalink Gallery[DIVISION BENCH]Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, S.ll–EvictionHELD are of the considered opinion that the petitioners do not have any locus standi to maintain this petition for the prayer made in the writ petition, particularly in respect of the orders passed by the Commissioner by which he has deleted the directions issued by the Collector in his order dated 10.12.2013. The locus standi to challenge the said order of the Commissioner was with the Gram Panchayat who could have filed the present writ petition had it been so advised.
-
Permalink Gallery[DIVISION BENCH] Recovery of Debts—Limitation—Exclusion of Period—Provision of Section 14 of Limitation Act – Held; Provisions of S.14 shall apply where the suit, appeal or application is filed in Court and not before the statutory authority, quasi judicial authority or the Tribunal/DRT.
-
Permalink GalleryAgreement to Sell—Specific Performance—Subsequent Buyer—When equity stand in favour of original buyer decree cannot be passed in favour of subsequent buyer merely because there was delay of more than 31 years in disposal of appeal of suit between original buyer and original seller, for absolutely no fault of subsequent buyer and he being in possession of for all that period
