This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.
Accident—Claim Petition—Service of deceased given to his wife—It does not diminish her entitlement of compensation under Motor Vehicles Act
By phlaw| 2019-11-27T18:20:06+00:00 November 27th, 2019|Claim Petition|Comments Off on Accident—Claim Petition—Service of deceased given to his wife—It does not diminish her entitlement of compensation under Motor Vehicles Act
Related Posts
Accident—Claim Petition—Merely because a witness slipped at a few places regarding the minute details does not go to put a question mark over his credibility and truthfulness
December 9th, 2019 | Comments Off on Accident—Claim Petition—Merely because a witness slipped at a few places regarding the minute details does not go to put a question mark over his credibility and truthfulnessAccident—Age of Deceased—It is to be taken as determined from documentary evidence and not merely as asserted in FIR
December 9th, 2019 | Comments Off on Accident—Age of Deceased—It is to be taken as determined from documentary evidence and not merely as asserted in FIRAccident–Claim Petition- Held; to throw proper light on the controversy examination of eye witnesses is necessary-Application under 0.41 R.27 CPC allowed-Civil Procedure Code, 1908, 0.41 R.27
December 2nd, 2019 | Comments Off on Accident–Claim Petition- Held; to throw proper light on the controversy examination of eye witnesses is necessary-Application under 0.41 R.27 CPC allowed-Civil Procedure Code, 1908, 0.41 R.27Accident—Claim Petition—Merely because the driver of offending vehicle has been acquitted in the criminal proceedings is not a ground in itself to dismiss the claim petition
November 15th, 2019 | Comments Off on Accident—Claim Petition—Merely because the driver of offending vehicle has been acquitted in the criminal proceedings is not a ground in itself to dismiss the claim petitionMotor vehicles Act, 1988, S.166 and S.2(30)—Accident—Registered Owner— Merely because the vehicle was transferred does not mean that such registered owner stands absolved of his liability to a third person—So long as his name continues in RTO records, he remains liable to a third person.
September 7th, 2019 | Comments Off on Motor vehicles Act, 1988, S.166 and S.2(30)—Accident—Registered Owner— Merely because the vehicle was transferred does not mean that such registered owner stands absolved of his liability to a third person—So long as his name continues in RTO records, he remains liable to a third person.Accident—Insurance—Pay and Recover— Disputed questions of fact regarding whether cover note was issued or cover note book was lost as alleged by Insurance Company—Insurance Company directed to pay compensation to claimants as awarded by MACT— Matter remanded back to Tribunal to go deep into issue of liability to pay between owner or insurer
August 25th, 2019 | Comments Off on Accident—Insurance—Pay and Recover— Disputed questions of fact regarding whether cover note was issued or cover note book was lost as alleged by Insurance Company—Insurance Company directed to pay compensation to claimants as awarded by MACT— Matter remanded back to Tribunal to go deep into issue of liability to pay between owner or insurerAccident—Claim Petition—Once the claim petition u/s 166 has failed; same cannot be converted under S. 163-A of the Act
June 24th, 2019 | Comments Off on Accident—Claim Petition—Once the claim petition u/s 166 has failed; same cannot be converted under S. 163-A of the Act