October 2019

Withdrawal of Suit—Issue of Limitation—While granting permission to withdraw the suit as wrong remedy of filing said suit was availed and granting liberty to file a fresh suit; it cannot be directed fresh suit should not be barred on account of limitation to file such suit

By | October 9th, 2019|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Withdrawal of Suit—Issue of Limitation—While granting permission to withdraw the suit as wrong remedy of filing said suit was availed and granting liberty to file a fresh suit; it cannot be directed fresh suit should not be barred on account of limitation to file such suit

Adverse Possession—Suit for Ownership—If a person has remained in possession for a long time, claiming documentary title to a property but eventually is unable to prove that title, he can also take an alternative plea of having been in adverse possession Adverse Possession—Revenue Records—In a plea of adverse possession, presumption of truth attached to record of rights is not to be considered

By | October 9th, 2019|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Adverse Possession—Suit for Ownership—If a person has remained in possession for a long time, claiming documentary title to a property but eventually is unable to prove that title, he can also take an alternative plea of having been in adverse possession Adverse Possession—Revenue Records—In a plea of adverse possession, presumption of truth attached to record of rights is not to be considered

September 2019

Limitation—Suit for Ownership—Suit filed in 2007 laying challenge to the sale deed executed in 1988—Knowledge of execution of sale deed was admitted in 1995—Held; Provision of Article 58 of Limitation Act would apply, instead of Article 59—Suit held to be rightly barred by limitation—Specific Relief Act, 1963, S.34.

By | September 13th, 2019|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Limitation—Suit for Ownership—Suit filed in 2007 laying challenge to the sale deed executed in 1988—Knowledge of execution of sale deed was admitted in 1995—Held; Provision of Article 58 of Limitation Act would apply, instead of Article 59—Suit held to be rightly barred by limitation—Specific Relief Act, 1963, S.34.

August 2019

Acknowledgment of Debt—Once income tax deducted at source on the accrued interest is deposited by the defendant, it is also an acknowledgment of the amount payable Acknowledgment of Debt—Twin Requirement—It has to be before the expiration of the prescribed period of limitation for filing a suit or application and has to be in writing signed by the party against whom such property or right is claimed.

By | August 25th, 2019|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Acknowledgment of Debt—Once income tax deducted at source on the accrued interest is deposited by the defendant, it is also an acknowledgment of the amount payable Acknowledgment of Debt—Twin Requirement—It has to be before the expiration of the prescribed period of limitation for filing a suit or application and has to be in writing signed by the party against whom such property or right is claimed.

Acknowledgment of Debt—Once income tax deducted at source on the accrued interest is deposited by the defendant, it is also an acknowledgment of the amount payable Acknowledgment of Debt—Twin Requirement—It has to be before the expiration of the prescribed period of limitation for filing a suit or application and has to be in writing signed by the party against whom such property or right is claimed.

By | August 4th, 2019|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Acknowledgment of Debt—Once income tax deducted at source on the accrued interest is deposited by the defendant, it is also an acknowledgment of the amount payable Acknowledgment of Debt—Twin Requirement—It has to be before the expiration of the prescribed period of limitation for filing a suit or application and has to be in writing signed by the party against whom such property or right is claimed.

March 2019

Adverse Possession—Defendant cannot take a plea of adverse possession against the co-owners in the absence of specific relief.

By | March 29th, 2019|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Adverse Possession—Defendant cannot take a plea of adverse possession against the co-owners in the absence of specific relief.

Adverse Possession—For claiming adverse possession there has to be a specific pleading with regard to the date, year and month of acquiring the ownership by way of adverse possession

By | March 28th, 2019|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Adverse Possession—For claiming adverse possession there has to be a specific pleading with regard to the date, year and month of acquiring the ownership by way of adverse possession

February 2019

Limitation Act, 1963, S.5–Condonation of Delay—Delay of 1100 days in filing appeal–Delay not condoned as fact of case do not reflect exercise of good faith.

By | February 28th, 2019|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Limitation Act, 1963, S.5–Condonation of Delay—Delay of 1100 days in filing appeal–Delay not condoned as fact of case do not reflect exercise of good faith.

November 2018

Limitation Act, 1963, S.5–Condonation of Delay-Sufficient Cause-A litigant who is not vigilant and diligent renders himself ineligible to seek indulgence in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction of the Court even if he has sufficient cause

By | November 24th, 2018|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Limitation Act, 1963, S.5–Condonation of Delay-Sufficient Cause-A litigant who is not vigilant and diligent renders himself ineligible to seek indulgence in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction of the Court even if he has sufficient cause

October 2018

Specific Relief Act, 1963, S.34–Suit for Recovery-Pronote-Limitation–New pronote or second pronote was in continuation of previous pronote–Once a partial payment was made and new pronote was executed for the remaining amount, the limitation cannot be counted from previous pronote

By | October 22nd, 2018|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Specific Relief Act, 1963, S.34–Suit for Recovery-Pronote-Limitation–New pronote or second pronote was in continuation of previous pronote–Once a partial payment was made and new pronote was executed for the remaining amount, the limitation cannot be counted from previous pronote

May 2018

Limitation—Exclusion of Time—Until and unless there is the decision of the Court regarding la ck of jurisdiction, period spent cannot be excluded for the purpose of limitation.

By | May 21st, 2018|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Limitation—Exclusion of Time—Until and unless there is the decision of the Court regarding la ck of jurisdiction, period spent cannot be excluded for the purpose of limitation.

March 2018

Limitation Act. 1963, -Acknowledgment of the payment should be made in the handwriting or in the writing signed by the person making payment.

By | March 2nd, 2018|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Limitation Act. 1963, -Acknowledgment of the payment should be made in the handwriting or in the writing signed by the person making payment.

February 2018

Limitation—Period of adjudication of an application to file suit as indigent person is to be excluded for computing the period of limitation prescribed for the suit.

By | February 18th, 2018|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Limitation—Period of adjudication of an application to file suit as indigent person is to be excluded for computing the period of limitation prescribed for the suit.

December 2017

V IMP : Specific Relief Act, 1963, S.20–Agreement to Sell-Specific Performance- Starting of limitation–Past payment towards sale consideration accepted after stipulated date of execution of agreement

By | December 28th, 2017|Limitation Act, Specific Performance|

Read More
Comments Off on V IMP : Specific Relief Act, 1963, S.20–Agreement to Sell-Specific Performance- Starting of limitation–Past payment towards sale consideration accepted after stipulated date of execution of agreement

Limitation Act, 1963, S.14–Exclusion of Period-Perusing of a criminal remedy cannot bring the civil suit within the provision of S.14 of Limitation Act.

By | December 13th, 2017|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Limitation Act, 1963, S.14–Exclusion of Period-Perusing of a criminal remedy cannot bring the civil suit within the provision of S.14 of Limitation Act.

Damages—Fatal Accident—Suit filed by petitioner for personal damages due to murder of her husband—Limitation to file suit for damages is two years from the date of death of victim.

By | December 4th, 2017|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Damages—Fatal Accident—Suit filed by petitioner for personal damages due to murder of her husband—Limitation to file suit for damages is two years from the date of death of victim.

Limitation Act, 1963, S.5-Condonation of Delay-Delay in filing the appeal or revision cannot and shall not be mechanically considered and in the absence of sufficient cause delay shall not be condoned.

By | December 2nd, 2017|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Limitation Act, 1963, S.5-Condonation of Delay-Delay in filing the appeal or revision cannot and shall not be mechanically considered and in the absence of sufficient cause delay shall not be condoned.

November 2017

Agreement to Sell—Specific performance— Limitation—instituted a suit for injunction -the very same relief would have been brought in the earlier suit on amendment held to be barred by limitation and also by O.2 R.2 CPC

By | November 25th, 2017|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Agreement to Sell—Specific performance— Limitation—instituted a suit for injunction -the very same relief would have been brought in the earlier suit on amendment held to be barred by limitation and also by O.2 R.2 CPC

Objections—Limitation—Appellant is a Company/Association having a board of directors, it cannot be considered to be part of state government and it has a separate private panel of lawyers

By | November 25th, 2017|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Objections—Limitation—Appellant is a Company/Association having a board of directors, it cannot be considered to be part of state government and it has a separate private panel of lawyers

Condonation of Delay—Delay of 242 days in filing first appeal—Explanation furnished not wholly unacceptable, even if there are some omissions—Delay is not inordinate, nor have any third party rights come—Delay condoned.

By | November 12th, 2017|Limitation Act|

Read More
Comments Off on Condonation of Delay—Delay of 242 days in filing first appeal—Explanation furnished not wholly unacceptable, even if there are some omissions—Delay is not inordinate, nor have any third party rights come—Delay condoned.