May 2019

Apprehension that petitioner may sell intoxicants during parole—Mere likelihood of committing a crime while on parole would not be a sufficient ground to decline temporary release on parole—No material on record to support such assertion—Application allowed—Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.22.

By | May 14th, 2019|Parole|

Comments Off on Apprehension that petitioner may sell intoxicants during parole—Mere likelihood of committing a crime while on parole would not be a sufficient ground to decline temporary release on parole—No material on record to support such assertion—Application allowed—Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.22.

Parole–Illness of Grandmother-Even though Grandmother is not included within the definition of family as per S.2(b) of the Act but petitioner’s case would be covered under “any other sufficient cause” as provided under S.3(l)(d) of the Act which covers unspecified causes.

By | May 14th, 2019|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole–Illness of Grandmother-Even though Grandmother is not included within the definition of family as per S.2(b) of the Act but petitioner’s case would be covered under “any other sufficient cause” as provided under S.3(l)(d) of the Act which covers unspecified causes.

Parole- -Mere fact that a person is convicted for an offence does not mean that he will abscond if he is released on parole—Parole granted.      

By | May 14th, 2019|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole- -Mere fact that a person is convicted for an offence does not mean that he will abscond if he is released on parole—Parole granted.      

Parole—Jail Offence—There is no complete bar on the release of a prisoner who he has been alleged to have committed a jail offence

By | May 13th, 2019|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole—Jail Offence—There is no complete bar on the release of a prisoner who he has been alleged to have committed a jail offence

Parole—Restriction of one year of imprisonment after conviction to be eligible for temporary release had been imposed by Rules which could not supersede the substantive provisions of the Act, which contained no such restriction

By | May 13th, 2019|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole—Restriction of one year of imprisonment after conviction to be eligible for temporary release had been imposed by Rules which could not supersede the substantive provisions of the Act, which contained no such restriction

October 2018

Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962, S.3—Parole— Pregnancy of Wife-Accused is in custody from more than 2 years and appeal against his conviction is pending-It is case of high risk pregnancy– Parole of 6 weeks granted

By | October 10th, 2018|Parole|

Comments Off on Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962, S.3—Parole— Pregnancy of Wife-Accused is in custody from more than 2 years and appeal against his conviction is pending-It is case of high risk pregnancy– Parole of 6 weeks granted

Parole—Overriding Effect—Prisoner is entitled for parole for the reasons given under the Act—Rider put the Rules cannot have an over-riding effect over the provisions of the Act.

By | October 3rd, 2018|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole—Overriding Effect—Prisoner is entitled for parole for the reasons given under the Act—Rider put the Rules cannot have an over-riding effect over the provisions of the Act.

September 2018

Parole-Jail Offence—Possession of mobile phone in jail premises—Held; that there is no allegation against the petitioner that he has misused the mobile phone/sim card for either to be blackmail someone or to demand ransom or for any other purpose of complicit in any other crime while being in jail—Direction issued to reconsider the application. 

By | September 30th, 2018|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole-Jail Offence—Possession of mobile phone in jail premises—Held; that there is no allegation against the petitioner that he has misused the mobile phone/sim card for either to be blackmail someone or to demand ransom or for any other purpose of complicit in any other crime while being in jail—Direction issued to reconsider the application. 

Parole—Mere recovery of mobile phone from an inmate would not be sufficient to categorise him as a ‘hardcore prisoner’. Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 S.3–Parole— Hardcore Prisoner-Jail offence-Recovery of mobile phone

By | September 30th, 2018|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole—Mere recovery of mobile phone from an inmate would not be sufficient to categorise him as a ‘hardcore prisoner’. Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 S.3–Parole— Hardcore Prisoner-Jail offence-Recovery of mobile phone

August 2018

June 2018

Parole—Emergency Parole—Fact that the petitioner has availed of the benefit of parole for some other reason would not disentitle him to parole on statutory available ground—Parole granted,

By | June 11th, 2018|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole—Emergency Parole—Fact that the petitioner has availed of the benefit of parole for some other reason would not disentitle him to parole on statutory available ground—Parole granted,

Parole–Emergency Parole- One month earlier petitioner has surrendered in time after availing six weeks parole—Petitioner has brought up his real brother’s son as his son since his childhood-Petitioner deserves to be released on interim parole so as to him to solemnize© the marriage of his nephew—Parole granted

By | June 8th, 2018|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole–Emergency Parole- One month earlier petitioner has surrendered in time after availing six weeks parole—Petitioner has brought up his real brother’s son as his son since his childhood-Petitioner deserves to be released on interim parole so as to him to solemnize© the marriage of his nephew—Parole granted

Parole– Applicant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment u/s 302 IPC-Petitioner released on parole for a period of one week to enable him to attend the marriage of his niece.                                                                                                                               

By | June 8th, 2018|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole– Applicant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment u/s 302 IPC-Petitioner released on parole for a period of one week to enable him to attend the marriage of his niece.                                                                                                                               

Parole-Agricultural Purpose—Merely because the mother of petitioner is there to look after the land would be no reason to decline such a prayer

By | June 8th, 2018|Parole|

Comments Off on Parole-Agricultural Purpose—Merely because the mother of petitioner is there to look after the land would be no reason to decline such a prayer

May 2018

April 2018

January 2018

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017