February 2020
-
Permalink GalleryService Law—Family Pension—Department was not justified in stopping the family pension on the ground that since amount of pension was not claimed, the same was stopped ii Service Law—Family Pension—Petitioner entitled for interest on delayed release @9% per annum from the date it became due till the same was released to petitioner
-
Permalink Gallery
Service Law–Gratuity–Withholding of Gratuity—A charge-sheet which has been served upon an employee after his/her retirement, cannot give a right to the employer to withhold the gratuity as the position is to be seen on the date of retirement and not subsequent Service Law—Gratuity—Withholding of Gratuity beyond jurisdiction-Petitioner held entitled to interest on the gratuity amount @9% per annum from the date it became due till its payment
January 2020
-
Permalink Gallery
[DIVISION BENCH] Service Law–Essential Qualification–Where there was no misrepresentation by a candidate, and despite his not possessing the qualifications he had been appointed and had worked for considerable time it would be grossly unfair and morally wrong to dismiss him from service later
December 2019
-
Permalink Gallery
Service Law—Pensionary Benefits—Delay in releasing—Petitioner held entitled for interest from the date the amount became due till the same are released favour of petitioner Service Law—Pensionary Benefits—Delay in releasing—Financial difficulty is not a valid ground to withhold the pensionary benefits of an employee
-
Permalink Gallery
Service Law–Punishment–Punishment/Penalty imposed in a departmental proceedings takes effect prospectively from the date of its imposition and would not relate back to the period when the alleged offence/misconduct was committed–Judgment in Major Singh Gill’s does not lay the correct law hence overruled.