Pre-emption—Before granting relief of pre-emption to a registered sale deed, the Court has to be certain about the existence of superior right, a tenant claims

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.

By phlaw| September 26th, 2020|Revenue Cases|Comments Off

Permalink
Gallery

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.16–Revision–Delay in Filing-Financial Commissioner without condoning the delay in filing the revision has proceeded to set aside the order passed by the Assistant Collector 1st Grade on the ground that petitioners have been proceeded against exparte

February 16th, 2020 | Comments Off on Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.16–Revision–Delay in Filing-Financial Commissioner without condoning the delay in filing the revision has proceeded to set aside the order passed by the Assistant Collector 1st Grade on the ground that petitioners have been proceeded against exparte
Permalink
Gallery

Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972 – Section 8(3), 9 and 12(3) – Determination of surplus land – Appellants were not bonafide purchasers, they have purchased the land from “M” vide Sale deed dated 14.06.1989 i.e. much after land stood vested in the State Government and after the Orders were passed by the Commissioner and Financial Commissioner HELD Appeal dismissed

January 28th, 2020 | Comments Off on Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972 – Section 8(3), 9 and 12(3) – Determination of surplus land – Appellants were not bonafide purchasers, they have purchased the land from “M” vide Sale deed dated 14.06.1989 i.e. much after land stood vested in the State Government and after the Orders were passed by the Commissioner and Financial Commissioner HELD Appeal dismissed
Permalink
Gallery

[DIVISION BENCH] East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, S.42–Revision–Opportunity of being heard–Once the petitioner had executed a valid Vakalatnama/Power of Attorney when the matter was pending before the Assistant Director, Consolidation then petitioners cannot claim that he was not heard before the impugned order-Petition dismissed.

December 30th, 2019 | Comments Off on [DIVISION BENCH] East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, S.42–Revision–Opportunity of being heard–Once the petitioner had executed a valid Vakalatnama/Power of Attorney when the matter was pending before the Assistant Director, Consolidation then petitioners cannot claim that he was not heard before the impugned order-Petition dismissed.
Permalink
Gallery

Security of Land Tenures—A tenant/lessee of agricultural land cannot be ordered to be evicted by way of suit for mandatory injunction

December 2nd, 2019 | Comments Off on Security of Land Tenures—A tenant/lessee of agricultural land cannot be ordered to be evicted by way of suit for mandatory injunction
Permalink
Gallery

Village Common Land—Nature of Land—The judgment and decree on admission would not have binding effect and cannot be constructed against the revenue record

December 1st, 2019 | Comments Off on Village Common Land—Nature of Land—The judgment and decree on admission would not have binding effect and cannot be constructed against the revenue record
Permalink
Gallery

Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1953– Ownership Rights—Merely because of coming into force of the 1953 Act, petitioners would not become the owners of the land on which they were tenants—Held; Firstly, the entries have to be made in the revenue record and if that being not the position, then the jurisdiction with regard to the issue would be that of the Civil Courts.

November 3rd, 2019 | Comments Off on Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1953– Ownership Rights—Merely because of coming into force of the 1953 Act, petitioners would not become the owners of the land on which they were tenants—Held; Firstly, the entries have to be made in the revenue record and if that being not the position, then the jurisdiction with regard to the issue would be that of the Civil Courts.
Permalink
Gallery

“….. since entries in the revenue records do not confer title to a property, nor do they have any presumptive value on the title. They only enable the person in whose favour mutation is recorded, to pay the land revenue in respect of the land in question. “

October 18th, 2019 | Comments Off on “….. since entries in the revenue records do not confer title to a property, nor do they have any presumptive value on the title. They only enable the person in whose favour mutation is recorded, to pay the land revenue in respect of the land in question. “

%d bloggers like this:

Search Here

Login

Membership open – Laws of India info group – LAWSINDIA.IN – Visit

Find us on Facebook

Supreme Court of India – Judgements

Guests have searched for Punjab & Haryana law

Judgements – Topic wise

Pre-emption—Before granting relief of pre-emption to a registered sale deed, the Court has to be certain about the existence of superior right, a tenant claims

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Related Posts

Login

Find us on Facebook

Supreme Court of India – Judgements

Guests have searched for Punjab & Haryana law

Judgements – Topic wise